Peer-review process
The DIEM journal (Digital Innovations in Economics and Management) is a globally distributed publication overseen by A.K. Kussayinov Eurasian Humanities Institute. The research article submitted to this online journal will undergo a double-blind peer review process, where both the reviewer and the author will remain anonymous to each other. There will be a minimum of two reviewers for the article. Research articles that have been approved will be accessible online after undergoing the journal's peer-review process. The language employed in this journal is English.
In order to detect plagiarism, the DIEM Editor will conduct a thorough examination of the manuscript's title, abstract, and body text. This will involve both manual screening using offline and internet databases, as well as the utilization of advanced plagiarism detection technologies such as Turnitin and iThenticate. If any sign of plagiarism is detected, the editorial board will promptly reject the submission.
Evaluation Procedure:
- Manuscript Receipt:
The editor receives the manuscript from the author.
- Initial Assessment:
The editor evaluates the paper based on the journal's objectives and scope, adherence to the journal's style guidelines, and the inclusion of any supplemental data. Manuscripts not meeting these requirements are rejected.
- Plagiarism Screening:
The editor conducts a manual plagiarism check using offline and online databases. Submissions with significant plagiarism are rejected. In cases of minor plagiarism or redundancy, the author is requested to provide clarification.
- Manuscript Forwarding to Reviewer:
The editor sends the manuscript and a review form to the reviewer, adhering to a double-blind review process, where the identities of both the reviewer and the author are kept anonymous.
- Review Process:
The reviewer completes the review form and returns it to the editor, along with the revised manuscript if necessary.
- Editorial Decision:
Based on reviewers' evaluations, the editorial board may make the following decisions:
Decline Submission: the manuscript is deemed unsuitable for publication.
Resubmit for Review (Major Revisions Required): the manuscript may be reconsidered following substantial revisions.
Revisions Required (Minor Revisions): the manuscript may be accepted after addressing minor revisions.
Accept: the manuscript can proceed to the subsequent stage without additional edits.
- Author Confirmation:
The author is informed about the editorial decision.
- Revision Process:
The author is expected to promptly return the amended manuscript. Submissions returned after more than three months are considered new submissions.
- Manuscript Evaluation Criteria
Significance: Does the manuscript demonstrate sufficient novelty and relevance in the field of digital economics and management?
Literature Review: Does the manuscript include a well-structured analytical review of relevant literature?
Research Design: Does the manuscript demonstrate an appropriate methodology? What is the quality of data and analysis?
Discussion: Do the discussion and conclusion highlight the significance of the results for research, policy, and practice?
Style: Is the manuscript clear, coherent, and concise? Does it comply with APA 7 formatting requirements?.
